Recently, we published our second Mobile Experience Scorecard , which evaluated the mobile sites of 100 of the largest multichannel retailers in the United States. Overwhelmingly, these multichannel retailers opted to implement dedicated mobile sites rather than responsive web design (RWD). Of the 100 companies, 91 used dedicated mobile, just 1 used responsive web design, and the remaining 8 used the desktop version of their site.
These results are not unlike those from our previous Mobile Experience Scorecard  report evaluating the Fortune 100, which demonstrated a similarly low proportion of sites using responsive web design, at just 9%. This is surprising because RWD is Google’s recommended configuration  for rendering websites across different devices. RWD’s SEO benefits are plentiful, so what is preventing companies both large and small from adopting it? In an earlier blog post , we suggested that companies were slow to implement responsive web design because of slow load times. Both of our reports provide data demonstrating that average load time for responsive design sites was significantly slower than for dedicated mobile sites.
According to SEO architect Kirby Burke, companies are “slow to adopt RWD for a number of reasons, most of which are external and have little or nothing to do with the SEO value of RWD.” To elaborate on Kirby’s point, consider these challenges:
- First, implementing RWD requires a large initial investment of both money and time. Everything has to start from zero – new code, new site, and new analytics have to be set up, paid campaigns have to be adjusted, etc.
- Implementation is also challenging for the IT team, who may have other priorities that outweigh the development of a new site.
- Finally, executives and stakeholders could simply be resistant to change. Like the old motto goes, ‘If it’s not broke, don’t fix it.’ These companies are converting and making revenue on their current mobile sites, so they may not see the need to make a new site. They don’t understand the benefits of RWD over dedicated mobile sites.
However, RWD is still the best solution and this is why Google endorses it. Implementing RWD is ‘future proofing’ your site. As devices continue to grow and change, maintaining one fluid site is absolutely necessary. This ensures a positive user experience for users on current devices as well as devices that have yet to be released. RWD also reduces the burden on developers because they only have to maintain one site instead of several.”
Dedicated mobile sites may perform well now, but future changes in technology could render these mobile sites obsolete. The choice between dedicated mobile sites and RWD is the choice between instant and delayed gratification. While responsive web design is costly to implement initially and often leads to longer load times, it represents a greater return on investment in the future. Slow load times can also be mitigated through the use of a few key strategies outlined by Kirby in an earlier blog post .
Check out our most recent Mobile Experience Scorecard on Multichannel Retailers  to see how some of the top multichannel retailers ranked and to find best practices for optimizing your site for mobile.
- State of Paid Search Report: Q2 2014  - July 17, 2014
- Travel Websites Lagging it on Mobile  - June 25, 2014
- Amazon and Twitter Partner Up with #AmazonCart  - May 5, 2014
- Large Gains for Bing in Q1  - April 17, 2014
- Solid Year-Over-Year Growth for Q1 of 2014  - April 16, 2014
- Female-Oriented Sites More Optimized for Mobile?  - March 28, 2014
- Web-Only Retailers Not as Mobile-Ready as They Should Be  - March 27, 2014
- Video Embeds Now Appearing in Google Search Results  - February 7, 2014
- Facebook Testing Graph Search on Mobile  - February 6, 2014
- Q4 Proves a Successful Quarter for Retail  - January 31, 2014