" />

Google’s Site Review Hangout Provides Trends, Not Details

Posted on Friday, November 22nd, 2013 by Print This Post Print This Post

Categories - Featured, News, SEO

site-review (1)

Google recently hosted a hangout to provide feedback on sites that webmasters submitted for review.  Although the hosts John Mueller and Pierre Far didn’t actually review sites individually, they did highlight example issues they found within the submitted sites and provided generalized advice on how to resolve some of the more common problems they discovered.

As the hosts described their process for reviewing sites, they first listed the areas they would examine that often cause problems for webmasters.  They also made a point to mention the areas they would NOT examine, areas which they no longer consider problematic as a result of Google’s improved ability to assess and ignore certain issues.  The list of elements Google said to ignore was rather surprising.

Although we’ve listed a few of the highlights below, it’s important to keep in mind the caveats that accompany each of these, typified by the word “usually.” For instance, lack of HTML validation “usually” isn’t a problem for the Google bots, and Google can “usually” compensate for mixed up 301 and 302 redirects.  However, “usually” by definition isn’t “always,” so webmasters should continue their optimization efforts in these areas whenever possible, adhering to best practices and common sense.

With this necessity in mind, what does Google say you don’t need to worry about?

  1. HTML validation: Google can usually pick up any page that has HTML on it – it doesn’t have to be valid.
  2. Missing robots.txt files: Forgetting to insert robots.txt files is not a problem. Google will simply continue crawling normally. Note: robots.txt files should be used for important crawler instructions, such as “blocking” directory crawls.
  3. Duplication from www/non-www or http/https sites: Google can usually reconcile duplicate content resulting from www/non-www or http/https URLs, unless the site is exceptionally large.
  4. 301 and 302 redirects: If you mix up 301 and 302 redirects, Google can usually figure out the difference – more specific to device detection / redirection.
  5. IDs in URLs: If you already have IDs in your URLs, you don’t have to go out of your way to rewrite them, as long as they are crawlable. Google still recommends “clean” URLs.

If anything, by indicating certain elements that webmasters usually don’t need to worry about, Google provides insight into some of the incremental improvements that the crawling system has made over the years. These changes make it easier for Google to identify common technical issues, potentially removing some of the burden from webmasters who are optimizing their sites.

Check out the archived recording of the hangout to get the whole story and to learn from some of the common mistakes made by other sites.  The hosts also indicated that they planned to hold more site review hangouts in the future where they might delve into individual sites to provide a deeper level of insight.

Tags | , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Google’s Site Review Hangout Provides Trends, Not Details”

  1. goji slim says:

    With havin so much content do you ever run into
    any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either created
    myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web
    without my authorization. Do you know any solutions to help prevent content from being stolen?
    I’d certainly appreciate it.

    Here is my weblog – goji slim

  2. www says:

    My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less.
    I’ve been using Movable-type on various websites for about a year and am worried about switching to another
    platform. I have heard good things about blogengine.net.

    Is there a way I can import all my wordpress posts into
    it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  3. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to this fantastic blog!
    I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
    I look forward to fresh updates and will talk about this site
    with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

  4. I’m not that much of a onloine reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back down the road.


    Here is my site; Seo tallahassee

  5. This is mmy first time visit at here and i am actuallky pleassant to read all at one place.

  6. One of the most interesting facts that get along with being
    a digital marketer specialising in some particular niche is the
    ability to understand that specific niche from various angles.
    Interactive advertisements will be able to increase the time spent with the advertisement
    which will build a more positive experience that will help persuade the consumer to take action. their record, and there is no surety with reference.

  7. check it out says:

    hello!,I like your writing very a lot! proportion we keep up
    a correspondence more about your article on AOL? I require a
    specialist in this area to solve my problem. May be that’s
    you! Taking a look ahead to peer you.


Leave a Reply

Follow Us on Twitter

Featured in Alltop

Big List - Search Marketing Blogs

2010 SEMMY Runner-Up

BoostCTR Best PPC Blogs