- The Search Agents - http://www.thesearchagents.com -
Privacy by Default: Why Facebook is Opposed
Posted By Ami Grant On May 23, 2011 @ 3:03 pm In Featured,News,Social Media | 2 Comments
As many are already familiar, Facebook just admitted it was responsible for a PR effort to plant negative stories in the press about Google and its cavalier attitude toward user privacy. Google was quick to point out that Facebook has come under fire for this very same issue. But behind this recent back-and-forth, is the hot button issue of privacy protection, and California’s first-of-its kind proposal – SB242 – to regulate social media sites, beginning with mandating new privacy policies.
Facebook may have brought this renewed interest in industry regulation upon itself when, in December 2009, it made all private data available to the public with no prior notification to subscribers, and more recently for its plans to disclose users’ home addresses and mobile numbers to third party application developers.
State Senator Ellen Corbett, sponsor of SB242, says “You shouldn’t have to sign in and give up your personal information before you get to the part where you say, ‘Please don’t share my personal information.’” Under the California proposal, it would be required for a “social networking Internet Web site to establish a process for new users to set their privacy settings as part of the registration process that explains privacy options in plain language, and to make privacy settings available in an easy-to-use format”. In other words, Facebook and other companies would have to allow users to establish their privacy settings at the creation of an account instead of after joining, or risk paying a steep fine. This seems reasonable enough, so why is Facebook, along with a coalition of industry associations and internet companies (including Google, Twitter, Zynga, Match.com, and Skype) so opposed to making the privacy settings more transparent to users?
Here’s a summary of the group’s oppositions  (By author Liz Gannes):
Facebook’s business model and revenue stream relies heavily on data mining its users’ personal information and repackaging and selling that information. Limiting user participation in this process would greatly affect Facebook’s bottom line. Google and other companies have the same concerns, which creates the odd arrangement of Facebook and Google fighting it out in the press, but allying with one another to stop this legislation.
So the bigger questions are:
The California legislation intends for Facebook to be completely up front about how it plans to use someone’s personal information so a user can make an informed decision to decline or accept the terms of service. Some users may welcome demographically targeted ads and games, while some may prefer to use the service solely for keeping in contact with friends and family. As data mining and micro-targeted advertising becomes a larger and larger share of online revenue, this issue will become more and more prominent for all parties concerned.
Article printed from The Search Agents: http://www.thesearchagents.com
URL to article: http://www.thesearchagents.com/2011/05/privacy-by-default-why-facebook-is-opposed/
URLs in this post:
 summary of the group’s oppositions: http://networkeffect.allthingsd.com/20110516/take-your-paws-off-our-privacy-laws-facebook-google-twitter-zynga-formally-oppose-california-social-networking-bill/?mod=ATD_rss
 Facebook Introduces New Privacy Controls: http://www.thesearchagents.com/2010/05/facebook-introduces-new-privacy-controls/
 Privacy Day on Facebook: http://www.thesearchagents.com/2009/12/privacy-day-on-facebook/
 The Week We Searched For- September 3, 2010: http://www.thesearchagents.com/2010/09/the-week-we-searched-for-september-3-2010/
Copyright © 2009 The Search Agents. All rights reserved.