<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Guy Starring Windows 7 – Old Media Jumps the Shark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thesearchagents.com/2009/10/family-guy-starring-windows-7-old-media-jumps-the-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thesearchagents.com/2009/10/family-guy-starring-windows-7-old-media-jumps-the-shark/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:00:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradd Libby</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchagents.com/2009/10/family-guy-starring-windows-7-old-media-jumps-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradd Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchagents.com/?p=2978#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Occasionally I have healthy pangs of doubt about the value of &#039;data-driven marketing&#039; and one of the quotes from the Variety article that was linked to (under &#039;until calmer heads prevailed&#039;, above) cements in my mind the need for a liberal infusion of common sense when making marketing decisions like the Family Guy tie-in:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;We initially chose to participate in the Seth and Alex variety show based on the audience composition and creative humor of &#039;Family Guy,&#039; but after reviewing an early version of the variety show, it became clear that the content was not a fit with the Windows brand,&quot; said a Microsoft spokeswoman.&lt;/em&gt;

I have no particular information about the internal decision-making process than what is revealed here, but in mentally translating Microsoft spokeswoman-speak to English I keep getting:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;We initially chose to participate in the Seth and Alex variety show because we bought a report from Nielsen indicating that &#039;Family Guy&#039; was popular among our target demographic for Windows 7, but after we realized that not one single upper-middle manager at Microsoft had actually seen an episode of &#039;Family Guy&#039;, it became clear that the content was not a fit with the Windows brand,&quot; said a Microsoft spokeswoman.&lt;/em&gt;

So, let&#039;s see if I&#039;ve got this straight: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6nqbc_bill-gates-jerry-seinfeld-microsoft_creation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uncomfortably homoerotic banter&lt;/a&gt; between Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a fit with the Microsoft brand, but &quot;riffs on deaf people, the Holocaust, feminine hygiene and incest&quot; - aka The Four Basic Food Groups of Family Guy Humor - &lt;em&gt;are not&lt;/em&gt;?  What the deuce?!

Recent episodes of Family Guy have dealt with: Star Trek The Next Generation, Surfin&#039; Bird, and OJ Simpson. OJ freakin&#039; Simpson.  The Gates/Seinfeld ad was made &lt;em&gt;10 years&lt;/em&gt; after Seinfeld&#039;s show went off the air.  In my opinion, Microsoft and Family Guy are a perfect fit for each other.  It seems that neither of them are able to acknowledge the existence of anything that happened after about mid 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally I have healthy pangs of doubt about the value of &#8216;data-driven marketing&#8217; and one of the quotes from the Variety article that was linked to (under &#8216;until calmer heads prevailed&#8217;, above) cements in my mind the need for a liberal infusion of common sense when making marketing decisions like the Family Guy tie-in:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;We initially chose to participate in the Seth and Alex variety show based on the audience composition and creative humor of &#8216;Family Guy,&#8217; but after reviewing an early version of the variety show, it became clear that the content was not a fit with the Windows brand,&#8221; said a Microsoft spokeswoman.</em></p>
<p>I have no particular information about the internal decision-making process than what is revealed here, but in mentally translating Microsoft spokeswoman-speak to English I keep getting:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;We initially chose to participate in the Seth and Alex variety show because we bought a report from Nielsen indicating that &#8216;Family Guy&#8217; was popular among our target demographic for Windows 7, but after we realized that not one single upper-middle manager at Microsoft had actually seen an episode of &#8216;Family Guy&#8217;, it became clear that the content was not a fit with the Windows brand,&#8221; said a Microsoft spokeswoman.</em></p>
<p>So, let&#8217;s see if I&#8217;ve got this straight: <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6nqbc_bill-gates-jerry-seinfeld-microsoft_creation" rel="nofollow">uncomfortably homoerotic banter</a> between Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld <em>is</em> a fit with the Microsoft brand, but &#8220;riffs on deaf people, the Holocaust, feminine hygiene and incest&#8221; &#8211; aka The Four Basic Food Groups of Family Guy Humor &#8211; <em>are not</em>?  What the deuce?!</p>
<p>Recent episodes of Family Guy have dealt with: Star Trek The Next Generation, Surfin&#8217; Bird, and OJ Simpson. OJ freakin&#8217; Simpson.  The Gates/Seinfeld ad was made <em>10 years</em> after Seinfeld&#8217;s show went off the air.  In my opinion, Microsoft and Family Guy are a perfect fit for each other.  It seems that neither of them are able to acknowledge the existence of anything that happened after about mid 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Green</title>
		<link>http://www.thesearchagents.com/2009/10/family-guy-starring-windows-7-old-media-jumps-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesearchagents.com/?p=2978#comment-583</guid>
		<description>These branded integrations are the last hope for network television.  It seems the only commercials anyone talks about anymore are the “I’m a Mac” ads -- which makes the unraveling of this Microsoft promotion all the more ironic. I&#039;m sure someone at Apple is either getting a good chuckle, or negotiating with Fox to step in as the exclusive sponsor.
  
With the growing popularity of DVRs and internet-streamed programming, product placement and sponsored programming will become even more prominent.  And it probably won’t be long until the networks respond with a direct response offering for advertisers.  Simply pause your favorite show, move your cursor over Jack Bauer’s cell phone or Eva Longoria’s sweater, and “purchase now.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These branded integrations are the last hope for network television.  It seems the only commercials anyone talks about anymore are the “I’m a Mac” ads &#8212; which makes the unraveling of this Microsoft promotion all the more ironic. I&#8217;m sure someone at Apple is either getting a good chuckle, or negotiating with Fox to step in as the exclusive sponsor.</p>
<p>With the growing popularity of DVRs and internet-streamed programming, product placement and sponsored programming will become even more prominent.  And it probably won’t be long until the networks respond with a direct response offering for advertisers.  Simply pause your favorite show, move your cursor over Jack Bauer’s cell phone or Eva Longoria’s sweater, and “purchase now.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
