" />

Google + Meta Keywords Tag ≠ Rankings? DUH!

Posted on Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009 by Print This Post Print This Post

Categories - SEO

Recently, Matt Cutts published on the Google Webmaster Central Blog that “Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking”. This shouldn’t come as any surprise to most SEOs as the Meta Keywords tag has been rapidly degrading over the past few years as a result of its previous abuse by the pioneers of SEO. This once mighty tag used to be the key to ranking gold. But as most good things go, it was a short-lived exploitation and today, many wonder if Google even pays any attention to this anemic tag. Well on Monday, September 21, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Matt Cutts confirmed our assumptions by stating to the world that Google could care less about the Meta Keywords Tag. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if  the original architects of the Google algorithm shudder in disgust every time someone mentions the word “Meta Keywords” (or was it Niagara Falls?). In any case, the final nail has been hammered into the coffin of the Meta Keywords tag.

WAIT! There’s more!!!

Another revelation in this recent Matt Cutts video post was in regards to the Meta Description tag. He stated that “Even though we sometimes use the description meta tag for the snippets we show, we still don’t use the description meta tag in our ranking.” This is a bit more shocking, but it has been rumored that the Meta Description was next in line after the Meta Keywords tag to get the axe. Well, the axe has fallen and the Meta Description has lost its head.

So what does this mean for SEOs who list the Meta Description and Meta Keywords tags as important tags to include for each page and optimize? The answer….nothing at all!

Nothing at all???? But Matt Cutts said…..

Yes I know what Matt Cutts said, and it’s great that he does provide us with this information about Google, as it allows us to create cleaner, more robust sites without completely burying our content as a result of poor search engine detection. But the revelation about the Meta Keywords and Meta Description tags actually doesn’t change a thing in regards to SEO meta content best practices.


Ah, ah, ah…just hold that thought for a second. I already know what you’re going to ask. So here are the answers to your (assumed) questions:


Q: Should we continue to optimize meta keywords tags even though Google just said they don’t consider it for ranking?

A: Yes. Just because Google doesn’t use it, doesn’t mean other search engines (big and small) don’t. I’m sure you would appreciate traffic from any search engine, so just because Google doesn’t care about it, doesn’t mean it’s a completely dead tag. It does mean, however, that you shouldn’t slave over creating the meta keywords tag. As long as you have a set of keywords/phrases in your Meta Keywords tag that relate directly to the content on your page, there’s no harm done.

Golden Rule…make sure your Meta Keywords tag contains keywords and phrases that are relevant to the page content. If you can’t make the Meta Keywords tag on your page unique, don’t have it at all. It’s better to have nothing than something that may appear as spam/keyword stuffing.


Q: Since Google says they don’t use the Meta Description tag to consider rankings, should we still optimize it?

A:Yes. The fundamentals of Meta Description tag optimization are 1) keyword phrase usage, and 2) length. These two elements are important whether Google analyzes the Meta Description tag for ranking or not. It’s beneficial to have the main keyword phrase you want your page to rank for in the Meta Description tag because when Google uses it for the snippet, we get the bolding effect — which we know from a user interaction perspective can be beneficial because it’s visual validation that your listing has the information the searcher is looking for. This does mean, however, that you don’t need to slave over keyword counts in the Meta Description tag.  And as for length, since you don’t want the description of your SERP result cut off, you want to make sure it’s of an ideal length/character count. Although we have seen the rise of the expanded description being used in some Google SERPs, it’s not used in most cases, and the shorter description is what you typically see in current Google SERPs.


Q: So what the heck does Google use to figure out rankings?

A: It’s looking like the Title Tag, on-page content (including Header tags),  and semantic word usage (and of course linking — internal and external — and clean site architecture) are the winners…Oh  and a hundred other things we’ll never know.

About David Waterman

David Waterman of The Search Agency+ works in SEO, Content Development and Online Marketing, at The Search Agency - 11150 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90064 as a Director of SEO/Search Marketing - Website: http://www.thesearchagency.com

David Waterman+ manages all SEO efforts for an assortment of clients. He has over 8 years of Search Engine Optimization experience with a specific emphasis on content optimization and website taxonomy/organization. He sets strategy for a wide array of top-tier clients in various industries and has experience managing international search marketing teams and servicing international clients. In his spare time he enjoys going to garage sales and swap meets in search of vintage and collectible items.



Tags | , , ,

6 Responses to “Google + Meta Keywords Tag ≠ Rankings? DUH!”

  1. Chris says:

    Very interesting and great having all the tips in one place.

  2. I would also like to bring up the point that the meta description tag may not be as important as it once was for rankings, but it is still important for click thru’s. You can and should use your meta description to grab the attention of the reader and encourage them to click. After all, what good is a high ranking position if nobody clicks.

  3. David Waterman says:

    Right you are Mr. Scaglione. Since it was thought for many years that the Meta Description had significant value in regards to rankings, marketing text was significantly reduced in them, or at least pushed to the end. However, now there’s the ability to actually build some strong messaging in Meta Descriptions since we don’t need to focus so much on keyword counts.

    HOWEVER…the one big thing to remember is that the snippet that Google pulls in the SERPS MIGHT be the Meta Description…but it might not. Google pulls content to form the description based on the search query. So, if you search on “hot pink tights” and your website has a page that talks all about hot pink tights, but for some reason your Meta Description doesn’t have the keyword phrase in it because you figured “Hey, the Meta Description doesn’t mean a thang no mo, so I’m not going to waste space by shoving in a keyword phrase. So instead, I’m gonna write the best sales description EVER!”, then there’s a good chance your amazing sales description WON’T show up in the SERP. Why? Because your Meta Description, the description that is now laden with amazing sales copy, doesn’t have the keyword phrase the search engine is looking for. So instead, random content is pulled from the site surrounding your usage of the term “hot pink tights” on the page.

    So what does this mean? It means you can write an amazing sales-based Meta Description for your page, but you still need to follow these 2 rules:

    1) Make sure every page has a unique Meta Description
    2) Make sure your Meta Description contains the primary keyword phrase you want that page to rank for. It’s a sure-fire way to ensure the search engines will display the actual page description you want to show in the SERPs.

  4. Mike S says:

    “The fundamentals of Meta Description tag optimization are 1)… , and 2) length.”

    Any chance you provide a source where we can read about the optimal length?

  5. Hollis Costner says:

    So true. Ripoff Report is nothing but spam. If anyone with half a brain would look at who submits these report they would see that over 40% are done by competitors. This is a joke, but it really does hurt legitimate businesses. I love this article because I did what you said and in 4 days the report was gone. Thanks Ryan.

  6. football says:

    That brings us to quite possibly the most intriguing match-up to that
    point of the season when Oregon comes to Rice-Eccles. Do you wear your own football package when actively playing football along with friends on the park or even wear your shirt casually around town or perhaps is this your ritual
    to wear your groups colors when going down to the pub.

    In a very short time he built a very, very thorough roster that
    can beat you in a number of ways.


Leave a Reply

Follow Us on Twitter

Featured in Alltop

Big List - Search Marketing Blogs

2010 SEMMY Runner-Up

BoostCTR Best PPC Blogs